The Leading News & Information Service For The Facilities, Workplace & Built Environment Community

Facial Recognition Now Available - But Trouble Brewing Ahead

With thanks to the ICO: Facial recognition systems are in the news again.
15 August 2019

A commercially available facial recognition system has just been launched. Meanwhile, developer Argent could be in hot water for using LFR and both the ICO and a Parliamentary Committee have questioned the technology.

ID Match scans visitors’ faces against the photos on their government issued IDs (e.g. passport or driving licence). The software identifies the accuracy of the match, reporting results to front desk and security personnel. Geoffroy De Cooman, MD of the developing company, Proxyclick, said: “Digitising the process of ID verification not only speeds up the check-in process and alleviates overloaded reception staff but also removes potential ‘human error’ from the equation. Automating the process also frees up security personnel to focus solely on the ‘bad guys’, providing the 99 per cent of ‘welcome’ visitors with a hassle-free check-in.”



Meanwhile, developers Argent may find themselves in hot water for deploying facial recognition technology across a vast area - the Kings Cross campus in London, home to the Google building along with 49 other commercial buildings, just under 2,000 homes, 10 public parks and up to 20 streets. Argent did not inform those using the space, nor the local council (Islington) and thus far has not been able to provide any legitimate grounds for the technology's use.

The Information Commissioner's Office has confirmed that any company wanting to use facial recognition systems must provide conclusive evidence to justify its use. Elizabeth Denham, the Information Commissioner herself, recently wrote that Live Facial Recognition (LFR) technology that can recognise a face amongst a crowd and then scan a databases to check for a match, sits in the province of processing personal data - and thus under the auspices of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR).


£99 million

Non-compliance with GDPR in July alone saw an estate agent fined £80,00 for failing to keep tenants' data safe; a domestic boiler replacement company fined £160,000 for making calls to those on the TPS subscriber list; and Marriott International fined £99 million for a well-publicised data breach.

It is clear that the ICO is sticking with a policy of ensuring fines reflect the size of the companies and their turnovers.


Financial Times

The Financial Times reported that an Argent spokesperson said: “The (CCTV) cameras deployed around Kings Cross use a number of detection and tracking methods, including facial recognition but also have sophisticated systems in place to protect the privacy of the general public.” The person did not confirm how many cameras were in use or how long facial recognition had been active in the area.

The FT also states that Canary Wharf Estates is planning to deploy LFR across their 97-acres of London which 140,000 people visit daily.


 Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee

The Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee has produced a report that highlights growing evidence from respected, independent bodies that the lack of legislation surrounding the use of automatic facial recognition has called the legal basis of police trials into question.

The Committee has called on the Government to issue a moratorium on the current use of facial recognition technology, saying no further trials should take place until a legislative framework has been introduced.



Elizabeth Denham has also said in relation to police trials of facial recognition: "I understand the purpose [of LFR] is to catch criminals. But these trials also represent the widespread processing of biometric data of thousands of people as they go about their daily lives. And that is a potential threat to privacy that should concern us all.

"LFR is a high priority area for the ICO. There remain significant privacy and data protection issues that must be addressed and I remain deeply concerned about the rollout of this technology. I believe that there needs to be demonstrable evidence that the technology is necessary, proportionate and effective considering the invasiveness of LFR."


South Wales Police

The South Wales Police force is one of those that was trialling LFR. A member of the public, supported by civil rights group Liberty, has challenged the lawfulness of its use through the courts. The ICO is awaiting the resulting judgment and will then publish further findings on the topic.

Until then, the ICO's stance is that 'organisations wishing to automatically capture and use images of individuals going about their business in public spaces need to provide clear evidence to demonstrate it is strictly necessary and proportionate for the circumstances - and that there is a legal basis for that use'.

"We will consider taking action where we find non-compliance with the law," said Elizabeth Denham.

Picture - With thanks to the ICO: Facial recognition systems are in the news again.





Article written by Brian Shillibeer | Published 15 August 2019


Related Articles

Not Smart to Block Wi-Fi

US firm Smart City has been forced to reach an agreement with the FCCEB to stop blocking consumers using their own data plans and forcing them on to paid wi-fi use at...

 Read Full Article
Hotel All At Sea Over Asbestos

Two companies have been fined. RJW Building Solutions, a contractor carrying out refurbishment work at the Sea Hotel in South Shields and Hotel 52, the client, were...

 Read Full Article
Sort The Confusion - Falling Recycling Rates Blamed On Lack Of Understanding

Waste giant Biffa has called for UK recycling confusion to be sorted, saying that inconsistency and confusion in labelling, sorting and collections are preventing UK...

 Read Full Article
Well Blow Me Down - Director Fined For Being Blown Off Roof

A director of a construction has seen his company (along with two others) fined when he was blown off an unsafe roof.  The three firms, Bowmer and Kirkland,...

 Read Full Article
Lanes Fined £500,000 After Worker Injured In Fall

Lanes Group PLC have been fined £500,000, with £9,896.19 costs, after pleading guilty to one offence under the Work at Height Regulations 2005. Westminster...

 Read Full Article
School Children Avoid Scaffolding Collapse

A scaffolding company has been fined after scaffolding it had erected collapsed onto a neighbouring primary school. Cardiff Magistrates’ Court heard Swain...

 Read Full Article
Sheriff Court Goes Further With Shell

The early days of August have already seen four companies receive substantial H&S fines. Shell received the biggest of these when a cylinder and valve becoming...

 Read Full Article
The Rights and Wrongs Of Prohibition Notices

The Supreme Court has recently decided that where a Prohibition Notice is served and subsequently found to be unfounded, the Notice can be rescinded or modified but the...

 Read Full Article
Vehicle Crushes Pedestrian & Other Cases

A worker has been sentenced after seriously injuring pedestrian - we have the disturbing CCTV footage of the incident plus news of another six...

 Read Full Article
Up, Up And Away - Drones Drafted In For Building Inspections

The Sky has become the limit as a new partnership looks to take inspection strategy to, quite literally, a whole new level.   Against the backdrop of an...

 Read Full Article