- Content
- Legal
- UK Government Looks to Reform Non-Compete Clauses
20 January 2021
In a consultation which closes in February this year, ministers are seeking views on non-compete clauses in employment contracts, in order to encourage more entrepreneurship.
Looking to California’s Silicon Valley as inspiration, where state law makes non-compete clauses unenforceable, this free movement of workers is given as a common reason for the growth of the technology industry in the state.
Non-compete clauses are used in contracts of employment to restrict an individual’s ability to work for a competing business or to establish a competing business for a defined period after they leave.
In order to encourage more UK start-up businesses, and to support economic growth post-COVID, the government is exploring avenues to make non-compete clauses enforceable only when the employer provides compensation during the term of the clause.
They are also considering an alternative proposal where non-compete clauses in contracts of employment are unenforceable, as in California.
“To support our economic bounce back, the government is exploring avenues to unleash innovation, create the conditions for new jobs and increase competition. We want to maximise opportunities for individuals to start new businesses, find new work and apply their skills to drive the economic recovery. For these reasons we are seeking views on reforms to noncompete clauses.”
–Statement from the government’s consultation description
What is the Alternative?
Charles Urquhart from Law firm Clyde & Co LLP, in a piece by legal insights pubisher Lexology, described the two main options that government are seeking views on.
One solution would require an employer to pay an employee during such a clause, which may encourage less of their use of in contracts. Similarly, it might discourage employed from breaching obligations.
According to Urquhart:
“The government is also asking for views on what level of compensation employers should have to pay if it goes ahead with this proposal. It suggests that this should be a level of compensation that is set as a percentage of the ex-employee's average weekly earnings prior to termination for the duration of the non-compete clause, e.g. 60 per cent, 80 per cent, 100 per cent or some other percentage.
“It is also asking whether the requirement to pay compensation during the period when the employee is restricted should be limited to non-compete clauses or should also apply to other types of post-termination restrictions, such as non-solicitation and non-dealing clauses.”
Another solution would be banning the clauses outright, making it easier for start-up businesses to form.
The government, however, recognises the need to “help protect legitimate business interests and prevent harm to a business”. The consultation document confirms that they are not seeking views on confidentiality clauses, intellectual property law or other means to protect legitimate business interests.
This consultation closes at 11:45pm on 26 February 2021
Picture: a picture of a person signing a paper contract
Article written by Ella Tansley | Published 20 January 2021
Share
Related Articles
UK Government Introduces Day-One Right to Request Flexible Working
Millions of employees across the country are set to benefit from new legislation that means flexible working can be requested from the first day of employment.
The...
Read Full Article
Posting On LinkedIn Whilst Furloughed – Is It A Breach?
As around 10 per cent of the private sector workforce is set to be furloughed and temporarily absent from work, is posting on LinkedIn during this time a legal grey...
Read Full Article
Martyn’s Law Gains Royal Assent
Landmark security legislation, Martyn’s Law, has gained Royal Assent.
The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill is in response to the 2017 Manchester...
Read Full Article
New Business Waste Separation Rules – What You Need to Know
As of 31 March 2025, workplaces in England will need to change how they manage their waste.
These new requirements will affect how companies handle their...
Read Full Article
What Does the Procurement Act 2023 Mean for Social Value?
Ahead of the Procurement Act going live in February 2025, Ian McKinnon from Veriforce CHAS looks at where social value fits in relation to the act.
Ian McKinnon, Chief...
Read Full Article
What’s Happening With Solar Panel Legislation?
The so-called Sunshine Bill was set to mandate solar PV panels on new builds, but it has been thwarted by the government.
The New Homes (Solar...
Read Full Article
Government Introduces Changes to Employment Rights
The new Employment Rights Bill is set to transform workers’ rights across the UK – let’s take a look at what’s changing.
Unfair...
Read Full Article
Martyn’s Law Introduced to Parliament
Martyn’s Law, also known as The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill, has finally been introduced to parliament.
After over seven years of campaigning, the...
Read Full Article
Government Proposes ‘Right to Switch Off’
The government is proposing to consult on the “right to switch off” for employees.
This would give employees the right to digitally disconnect from...
Read Full Article
Building Services Contractors Must Consider Changes to Legal Liabilities
The Building Safety Act is already changing the legal landscape for the building services profession, according to BESA.
The association considers the extension of the...
Read Full Article