The Leading News & Information Service For The Facilities, Workplace & Built Environment Community

Maintenance Operatives and Workplace Exposure

Maintenance Operatives and Workplace Exposure
07 September 2020

With the potential to be exposed to the highest levels and widest range of harmful physical and chemical agents, maintenance operatives must be monitored closely to ensure that they remain fully compliant with the appropriate health and safety legislation, guidelines and limits.

Occupational hygiene consultants visit a wide range of industries, from bakeries and petroleum plants to pharmaceutical sites and foundries. In addition to production operatives, many sites also employ maintenance operatives. 

Chris Mills, Occupational Hygienist at SOCOTEC, a provider of testing, inspection and compliance services, explains more about the monitoring needed for this type of workforce.


What is a Maintenance Operative?


The role of a maintenance operative (or fitter) can vary greatly from site to site. At smaller companies, the maintenance operative covers a wide range of responsibilities, carrying out genuine maintenance, looking at breakdowns, repairs and fabrication and painting and cleaning up where necessary. Smaller companies will sometimes have just one maintenance operative, whereas larger companies may have teams who cover different shifts. These may be dedicated to either electrical or engineering works, or just have their own areas of large sites to cover.


Why is it so Important to Regularly Monitor a Maintenance Operative’s Exposure to Hazardous Substances?


When it comes to monitoring exposure to airborne substances which are hazardous to health, a maintenance operative can potentially visit any area of the site and be involved in multiple activities and processes in any given day. Maintenance operatives will usually be exposed to whatever substances are present in the area that they are sent to work in; however, fitters can also create additional airborne substances, such as dust from grinding/drilling, fume and gases from welding and cutting and solvent vapours from the use of sprays, adhesives and paints. They may also have to clean down the area they are visiting prior to any work being carried out, as this could lead to secondary dust exposures if the area is not cleaned thoroughly.

Fitters will often also carry out a wide range of maintenance work and repairs within their own workshops. In many cases, no two days will be the same in terms of location, duration and tasks carried out by maintenance staff, and therefore they can be exposed to differing substances at varying levels of exposure, producing a number of different exposure results throughout the week. One day’s sampling is unlikely to be representative of "typical" exposure, and therefore monitoring across a range of activities should be considered for these types of workers. Where possible, exposure monitoring should be aligned with maintenance schedules to capture and assess specific tasks.

In addition to these difficulties in assessing a fitter’s exposure, the method of monitoring may be restricted due to the area they are working in. For example, work may be within a confined space, and as a result, the operative may be unable to wear a sampling train. In Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations (DSEAR) areas, ATEX rated equipment will be required in order to prevent explosions. In food industries, glass instruments and sample media might not be appropriate due to the risk of contaminating the products. Sampling equipment may also need to be specially cleaned in food/pharma environments.

Before carrying out any monitoring, occupational hygiene consultants will need to know the areas that the operative may be visiting and what they are monitoring the maintenance operative for. This, of course, may change if they are called out for an emergency maintenance job in another area of the site. Once the maintenance work has been carried out, further consideration should be taken as to what the results are representative of and if this has varied from the initial scope.


Monitoring Exposure to Noise


When monitoring a maintenance operative for noise, their exposure is likely to be different every day. Exposure levels are generally down to the areas they visit, whether or not the plant is running in the areas they are working and the tools they have to use. Short periods of very high-intensity noise generated by power tool use or hammering can have a significant effect on an operative’s daily noise exposure. This can be overlooked in a task risk assessment and, as a result, inadequate controls are put in place. Many potential sources of exposure should be considered during an assessment, which may involve short-term samples of multiple scenarios to enable maintenance teams to minimise their exposure.

Upon entering Hearing Protection Zones, maintenance operatives must wear hearing protection, especially if machinery is running. However, if the machinery is not running, a maintenance operative may decide that hearing protection is not required.  They should still be mindful that the use of power tools can create high noise levels. Fitters should be supplied with sufficient information regarding the noise levels of specific tools and the effect of their own exposure, as well how much it would impact those around them. This information will allow for the correct selection of hearing protection as and where appropriate. 


"Careful consideration should be taken towards a wide range of maintenance worker tasks prior to their taking place, as this will ensure the most appropriate exposure control measures can be applied. This may involve the specific measurement/assessment as carried out by a qualified occupational hygienist, or the use of known concentrations or levels for given tasks."

–Chris Mills

Occupational Hygienist, SOCOTEC 




Many of the tools used by a maintenance operative – including impact wrenches, drills, grinders and saws – will lead to hand-arm vibration exposure. The specific tools that are used, the duration of use and the manner in which they are used is likely to vary from day-to-day. As a result, assessment of exposure to hand-arm vibration will be required daily.


It is recommended that all tools with their various attachments are measured for typical vibration levels, and the number of HSE vibration points per five/ten minutes is calculated. Maintenance operatives should then have the list of tools and points with them so as to be able to calculate their likely exposure during their working day. Once the Exposure Action Value of 100 points is reached, no further use of vibrating tools should be undertaken. This may prove difficult where the maintenance team is a "one man band"; however, it is important to give these operatives the required information to assess whether or not a task can be completed by a single member of staff.


Electromagnetic Fields


Maintenance operatives may also be exposed to the unintentional emission of electromagnetic fields (EMF) from electrical equipment, including welding sets, battery and electric power tools and electrical plant equipment they may be working on. In most cases, it will be possible to assess the risk of exposure by using HSE guidance, manufacturer’s details and other resources, such as those provided by the Welding Institute.

A key control for maintenance operatives during welding would be to avoid draping welding cables over their body, as this is typically where the most significant exposures will arise. EMF from welding equipment and power tools poses a far greater risk to health to "employees at particular risk", including those with active implants, such as pacemakers. Therefore, an additional risk assessment would need to be generated, which may include the requirement to measure EMF with specialist equipment. Additional controls, such as signage, restricting access and use of certain equipment, would also need to be applied.

In summary, a maintenance operative is commonly exposed to the highest levels and widest range of substances and physical agents at work. However, exposure to workplace hazards can sometimes be overlooked, with monitoring often considered as an afterthought. 

Careful consideration should be taken towards a wide range of maintenance worker tasks prior to their taking place, as this will ensure the most appropriate exposure control measures can be applied. This may involve the specific measurement/assessment as carried out by a qualified occupational hygienist, or the use of known concentrations or levels for given tasks.

Picture: A photograph of a maintenance operative in full PPE

Article written by Chris Mills | Published 07 September 2020


Related Articles

SOCOTEC UK Secures Three New Asbestos Management Contracts

SOCOTEC UK’s asbestos team has secured three major contracts with three of the UK’s largest supermarket and retail chains. These contracts, worth over...

 Read Full Article
Education is Crucial for Asbestos Management in Schools

SOCOTEC is highlighting the risk of asbestos exposure in UK schools, and what the FMs should be doing about it.  One of the main issues with regards...

 Read Full Article
MedTech Company Looks to Solve NHS' Clinical Waste and Plastic Problem

A British MedTech company is helping the NHS to reduce CO2 emissions in its clinical waste disposal by 95 per cent. It is hoped that this will save tens of millions of...

 Read Full Article
Tesco Invests in Risk Management Technology for a Safer Workplace

Tesco is to centralise its workplace risks and hazards data to create a safer workplace for its staff. The global retailer has joined forces with Alcumus to...

 Read Full Article
SOCOTEC Trials Asbestos Air Monitoring Device

SOCOTEC is trialling a new device that provides real-time data and warnings for airborne asbestos. Working with Alert Technology Ltd, SOCOTEC is trialling a portable...

 Read Full Article
Hygiene in Reopening Hospitality

With COVID-19 having sent infection fears skyrocketing over the past year, new research from JLA reveals that more than half of customers prioritise hygiene and...

 Read Full Article
New Appointments in Facilities Management – March 2021

This March has seen several new appointments, including at ISS, SOCOTEC, Cleanology, BCIA and Planet Mark.   Picture: a graphic showing headshots of Liz...

 Read Full Article
Major Rail Company Uses Swabbing Service to Test for COVID

A major rail company, thought to be Govia Thameslink Railway, is using a sterile swabbing service to test for traces of COVID-19 across their trains and stations. The...

 Read Full Article
Ensuring the Safety of a Building’s Water System

Find out how to make sure your building’s water system is compliant with the new British standard BS 8680:2020. Every water system will require regular...

 Read Full Article
JLL and SGS to Verify Cleaning Procedures and Protocols for Workplaces

JLL is collaborating with SGS to help building owners and occupiers confirm their spaces are cleaned appropriately and safely. JLL’s recent research revealed...

 Read Full Article